Theory (what is calculated)¶
This is the theory track – a short umbrella that tells you where to find each accident type’s derivation and the few global conventions shared by all of them. For the call-tree companion (the “how” track), see Code Flow: From “Run Model” to Results.
The IWRAP framework in one equation¶
Every accident frequency OMRAT reports has the form
\(N_A\) is the geometric candidate count – how often an accident could happen from geometry + traffic alone.
\(P_C\) is the causation factor – the conditional probability that a candidate becomes an actual accident (the crew fails to avoid, the machinery fails, etc.).
The accident-type chapters derive \(N_A\) from first principles and give sources for \(P_C\):
Chapter |
Covers |
|---|---|
Drifting grounding / allision / anchoring. The largest
chapter, with five worked examples in
|
|
Head-on, overtaking, crossing, bend collisions (Hansen eq. 4.2-4.4, Pedersen). |
|
IWRAP Category II powered grounding + allision (\(N_{II} = P_c Q m \exp(-d/(a_i V))\)). |
Default causation factors¶
OMRAT ships the IALA default table. These are the values most published studies use unless there’s local data.
Accident type |
IALA default |
Fujii (1974) |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Head-on collision |
\(4.9 \times 10^{-5}\) |
\(4.9 \times 10^{-5}\) |
TSS present helps; higher in narrow lanes. |
Overtaking collision |
\(1.1 \times 10^{-4}\) |
\(1.1 \times 10^{-4}\) |
|
Crossing collision |
\(1.3 \times 10^{-4}\) |
\(1.2 \times 10^{-4}\) |
Pedersen value. |
Bend collision |
\(1.3 \times 10^{-4}\) |
– |
Pedersen value. |
Powered grounding |
\(1.6 \times 10^{-4}\) |
\(1.6 \times 10^{-4}\) |
|
Allision (structure) |
\(1.9 \times 10^{-4}\) |
\(1.9 \times 10^{-4}\) |
|
Drifting |
\(1.0\) |
– |
No avoidance – the ship is powerless. |
Local adjustment factors are typically applied on top:
Ferry / passenger vessels – divide by 20 (two navigators, well-known route).
Pilot on board – divide by 3 (COWIconsult).
Poor visibility (3-10 %) – multiply by 2.
Poor visibility (10-30 %) – multiply by 8.
Adjust these in Settings -> Causation Factors if your project needs them.
Lateral traffic distribution¶
Ship positions across a lane are modelled as a mixture of up to three Gaussian components and one uniform component:
where
\(z\) is the lateral distance from the leg centreline (m),
\(w_i\), \(\mu_i\), \(\sigma_i\) are the weight, mean, and standard deviation of Gaussian \(i\),
\(w_u\) is the weight of the uniform component on \([a, b]\),
weights are normalised so \(\sum w_i + w_u = 1\).
You can fit the mixture from AIS data or set it by hand. Values are
stored per segment per direction (mean1_1, std1_1,
weight1_1, u_min1, u_max1, u_p1, etc.).
Implemented in
compute.data_preparation.get_distribution().
Coordinate systems¶
WGS84 (EPSG:4326) – all stored geometry, user inputs, and the
.omratJSON file. Lon/lat.UTM – used internally for metric calculations. OMRAT picks the zone from the study-area centroid and projects once per run.
The drifting model lives in UTM end-to-end. The powered model uses
a cheaper per-project equirectangular projection centred on the
first leg’s start point (SimpleProjector), which is fine at the
per-leg length scale where rays travel tens of kilometres.
Compass convention¶
OMRAT uses standard nautical bearings everywhere: 0 = N, 90 = E, 180 = S, 270 = W, measured clockwise from north. The wind rose, stored segment bearings, and drift directions all follow this convention.
Internal math uses the standard math convention (0 = E, counter-clockwise). The conversion is:
Canonical implementation:
drifting/engine.py:compass_to_math_deg. Callers that need an
(x, y) step-vector directly use geometries/drift/coordinates.py:compass_to_vector.
Direction |
Bearing |
Vector (+X=East, +Y=North) |
|---|---|---|
N |
0 |
(0, +d) |
NE |
45 |
(+d/sqrt(2), +d/sqrt(2)) |
E |
90 |
(+d, 0) |
SE |
135 |
(+d/sqrt(2), -d/sqrt(2)) |
S |
180 |
(0, -d) |
SW |
225 |
(-d/sqrt(2), -d/sqrt(2)) |
W |
270 |
(-d, 0) |
NW |
315 |
(-d/sqrt(2), +d/sqrt(2)) |
References¶
Friis-Hansen, P. (2008). IWRAP MK II - Basic Modelling Principles for Prediction of Collision and Grounding Frequencies. Technical University of Denmark.
Pedersen, P.T. (1995). Collision and Grounding Mechanics. WEMT’95.
Fujii, Y. et al. (1974). Some factors affecting the frequency of accidents in marine traffic. Journal of Navigation, 27.
Talavera, A. et al. (2013). Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for the quantification and propagation of the uncertainty caused by the use of AIS data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 111, 95-105.
Engberg, P.C. (2017). IWRAP Mk2 v5.3.0 Manual. GateHouse A/S.