5. Network

Note

This documentation, as well as the SQL code it referred to, comes from the seminal work done in TranspoNet by Pedro and Andrew.

The objectives of developing a network format for AequilibraE are to provide the users a seamless integration between network data and transportation modeling algorithms and to allow users to easily edit such networks in any GIS platform they’d like, while ensuring consistency between network components, namely links and nodes.

As mentioned in other sections of this documentation, the AequilibraE network file is composed by a links and a nodes layer that are kept consistent with each other through the use of database triggers, and the network can therefore be edited in any GIS platform or programatically in any fashion, while these triggers will ensure that the two layers are kept compatible with each other by either making other changes to the layers or preventing the changes.

Although the behaviour of these trigger is expected to be mostly intuitive to anybody used to editing transportation networks within commercial modeling platforms, we have detailed the behaviour for all different network changes in Change behavior .

This implementation choice is not, however, free of caveats. Due to technological limitations of SQLite, some of the desired behaviors identified in Change behavior cannot be implemented, but such caveats do not impact the usefulness of this implementation or its robustness in face proper use of the tool.

As described in the The AequilibraE project the AequilibraE network is composed of two layers (links and nodes), …

The parameters file has quite a few controls for the creation of AequilibraE networks, and it is important to discuss them

5.1. Network Fields

5.1.2. Nodes

Field name

Field Description

Data Type

node_id

Unique identifier. Tied to the link table’s a_node & b_node

Integer (32/64 bits)

The optional fields may include, but are not limited to the following:

Field name

Field Description

Data Type

is_centroid

node_id of the first (topologically) node of the link

Integer (32/64 bits)

TAZ

Zone in which the zone is located

Integer (32/64 bits)

5.1.3. Future components

  1. Turn penalties/restrictions

  2. Transit routes

  3. Transit stops

5.2. Importing from Open Street Maps

Please review the information parameters

Note

ALL links that cannot be imported due to errors in the SQL insert statements are written to the log file with error message AND the SQL statement itself, and therefore errors in import can be analyzed for re-downloading or fixed by re-running the failed SQL statements after manual fixing

5.3. Network consistency behaviour

In order for the implementation of this standard to be successful, it is necessary to map all the possible user-driven changes to the underlying data and the behavior the SQLite database needs to demonstrate in order to maintain consistency of the data. The detailed expected behavior is detailed below. As each item in the network is edited, a series of checks and changes to other components are necessary in order to keep the network as a whole consistent. In this section we list all the possible physical (geometrical) changes to each element of the network and what behavior (consequences) we expect from each one of these changes. Our implementation, in the form of a SQLite database, will be referred to as network from this point on.

Ensuring data consistency as each portion of the data is edited is a two part problem:

  1. Knowing what to do when a certain edit is attempted by the user

2. Automatically applying the tests and consistency checks (and changes) required on one

5.3.1. Change behavior

In this section we present the mapping of all meaningful changes that a user can do to each part of the transportation network, doing so for each element of the transportation network.

5.3.1.1. Node layer changes and expected behavior

There are 6 possible changes envisioned for the network nodes layer, being 3 of geographic nature and 3 of data-only nature. The possible variations for each change are also discussed, and all the points where alternative behavior is conceivable are also explored.

5.3.1.1.1. Creating a node

There are only two situations when a node is to be created: - Placement of a link extremity (new or moved) at a position where no node already exists - Spliting a link in the middle

In both cases a unique node ID needs to be generated for the new node, and all other node fields should be empty An alternative behavior would be to allow the user to create nodes with no attached links. Although this would not result in inconsistent networks for traffic and transit assignments, this behavior would not be considered valid. All other edits that result in the creation of un-connected nodes or that result

in such case should result in an error that prevents such operation

5.3.1.1.2. Deleting a node

Deleting a node is only allowed in two situations: - No link is connected to such node (in this case, the deletion of the node should be handled automatically when no link is left connected to such node) - When only two links are connected to such node. In this case, those two links will be merged, and a standard operation for computing the value of each field will be applied.

For simplicity, the operations are: Weighted average for all numeric fields, copying the fields from the longest link for all non-numeric fields. Length is to be recomputed in the native distance measure of distance for the projection being used.

A node can only be eliminated as a consequence of all links that terminated/ originated at it being eliminated. If the user tries to delete a node, the network should return an error and not perform such operation.

5.3.1.1.3. Moving a node

There are two possibilities for moving a node: Moving to an empty space, and moving on top of another node.

  • If a node is moved to an empty space

All links originated/ending at that node will have its shape altered to conform to that new node position and keep the network connected. The alteration of the link happens only by changing the Latitude and Longitude of the link extremity associated with that node.

  • If a node is moved on top of another node

All the links that connected to the node on the bottom have their extremities switched to the node on top The node on the bottom gets eliminated as a consequence of the behavior listed on Deleting a node

5.3.1.1.4. Adding a data field

No consistency check is needed other than ensuring that no repeated data field names exist

5.3.1.1.5. Deleting a data field

If the data field whose attempted deletion is mandatory, the network should return an error and not perform such operation. Otherwise the operation can be performed.

5.3.1.1.6. Modifying a data entry

If the field being edited is the node_id field, then all the related tables need to be edited as well (e.g. a_b and b_node in the link layer, the node_id tagged to turn restrictions and to transit stops)